Hand washing has always been important, and the epidemic further enhances its vital role in helping to prevent the spread of germs. But a new study suggests that the methods used to dry hands can be just as important for public health.
A pilot study published Wednesday in “Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology” found that the use of high-speed hand dryers can transfer germs into a person’s clothing and spread these contaminants to other surfaces.
In the study, volunteers took part in an experiment to dry their hands with a hand dryer or paper towel and test whether any contaminants were spread in the test while wearing an apron. They then take different paths around a hospital and touch commonly used surfaces
Bacteria in the bathroom: Hand dryers suck the fecal bacteria and throw them in front of your hands, the study found.
The levels of germs spread on the volunteers ’touching surfaces were 10 times higher after hand drying with a dryer than with paper towels. There was a greater transfer of bacteria to the apron when the volunteers used the dryer, which further contributed to the spread of germs.
We question the choice of air drying in a healthcare setting based on surface contamination after users and hand-drying using a high-speed air dryer, ”said Ines Moura, a research associate at the University of Leeds and author of the study.
The results are also relevant for public restrooms, including high-powered traffic, Moura said in a news release.
The results are consistent with previous research on hand dryers, said Timothy Calfield, research director at the University of Alberta’s Institute of Health Law.
“These studies include recommendations that“ health professionals should only use paper towels at all levels, ”he said, adding that hospitals.
So why are hand dryers often found in public restrooms?
“I think the hand dryers’ move has been driven by a number of factors, including cost, environmental concerns and, in general, pushing public health to wash people’s hands,” Clift told the United States today.
We question the choice of air drying in a healthcare setting based on surface pollution after users and hand dryers using high-speed air dryers, ”said Ines Moura, a research associate at the University of Leeds and author of the study.
The filibuster as a legal tool was accidentally created in 1806, when a year ago, at the urging of Vice President Aaron Burr, the Senate removed the “previous question” motion, a rule that was rarely used at the time, allowing the Senate to vote. The issue is currently under debate. This unexpectedly opened the door for senators to continue the debate indefinitely – Philipbuster ter
It was not used regularly until the mid-nineteenth century, when the debate over the limitations or abolition of slavery was used by graduates. There was no way to end any filibuster, so pro-slavery politicians like Sen. John C. Calhoun of South Carolina opposed the spread of slavery against the spread of slavery and resisted “free land” measures.
Philipster was effectively limited only by Senate rules and personal relationships between lawmakers until 191, when the Senate enacted the Culture Act. New rules passed in support of American war effort in World War I have allowed two-thirds of senators to end the debate on current issues.
In the political era of the past, Philipster was rarely used and was often ousted by the ruling coalition. The exception during the twentieth century was civil rights law. Southern senators, who support the Jim Crow system of racial segregation and white hegemony, used Philipster to vehemently oppose any kind of educational, economic, or suffrage extension for black Americans.